The Dominant Hospital EHR
Over 300 major health systems run Epic — Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente. Data-heavy clinical products connect here.
Epic integration connects your app to Epic's EHR to exchange records, appointments, medications and labs through a compliant ecosystem.
Over 300 major health systems run Epic — Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente. Data-heavy clinical products connect here.
Epic exposes multiple frameworks — App Orchard, FHIR APIs, Bridges and MyChart — each built for a different level of data access.
Epic requires external apps to pass formal review and certification before touching production — plan for it early to save months.
Epic offers several integration frameworks — we build to the pathway your product needs.
Epic's footprint in large hospitals makes it unavoidable for any product targeting hospital-based care.
Over 250 million U.S. patients have an Epic record, most seen at large health systems and academic medical centers.
Ontario Health chose Epic for its provincial network — making integration increasingly relevant in Canada.
Health system IT buyers treat App Orchard certification as proof an app is Epic-reviewed and safe to deploy.
Most products that integrate with Epic also need one or more of these. Each links to how we build it.
The other platform hospital buyers ask about. Ignite FHIR R4, CareAware and Millennium HL7 v2.
The standard behind Epic on FHIR: resources, profiles, SMART on FHIR authorization and bulk export.
What Epic Bridges speaks. ADT, ORU and ORM messaging for everything FHIR does not yet cover.
Encryption, access control and audit logging designed in before a health system security review.
One internal data model behind Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth so each new EHR is configuration.
Not sure which pathway fits? Start with an assessment of your systems and integration roadmap, or see the full <a href="/healthcare-software-development">healthcare software development</a> practice.
App Orchard, FHIR R4, Bridges or MyChart, server- and client-side. Book a consultation to scope a certifiable Epic implementation.
Book an Epic Consult
100 Fastest Growth Companies
Global Spring Winner
Top App Development Company
AWS Partner Network
Google Cloud Partner
Highly Rated on Trustpilot
Verified Agency
Top App Development Company
ASSOCHAM Member
It depends on scope and App Orchard review speed. Basic FHIR work in the open sandbox takes a few weeks; certification and a production connection typically take three to six months.
Four pathways cover almost every case. Register on the Epic developer program and build against the open FHIR R4 sandbox; use SMART on FHIR for launch and authorization inside Epic; use Bridges HL7 v2 interfaces for messaging that FHIR does not cover; and publish through App Orchard or Showroom when you need distribution to health systems. Production access always requires a sponsoring health system.
App Orchard, now part of Epic Showroom, is Epic's marketplace for third party applications. Listing is not required for a private integration at a single health system, but it is the practical route to distribution because hospital buyers look there first and it standardizes the technical review.
Yes. Ambient documentation tools launch inside Epic via SMART on FHIR, read encounter context through FHIR R4 APIs, and write finished notes back into the chart. Epic also ships native and partner options, so third party tools are evaluated against that baseline in most hospital deals.
The Epic developer sandbox is free. Real cost sits in engineering: a focused FHIR integration is typically a few weeks of work, while certification, security review and a production connection at a health system run three to six months of effort. Budget for the health system's own review cycle, which is usually the longest pole.
Not necessarily — it matters most for products exchanging clinical data with large hospital systems. Anything selling into hospital markets usually needs it.
Epic's FHIR R4 APIs expose demographics, conditions, medications, labs, vitals, notes and encounters — with availability set by authorized SMART on FHIR scopes under USCDI.
Both use HL7 FHIR R4 and SMART on FHIR, but the profiles, search parameters and developer programs differ. An application built for Epic will not work against Oracle Health without integration layer changes, so teams selling into both markets should plan a vendor neutral internal data model.
The core Epic platform and FHIR APIs work the same in both countries. Canadian implementations may differ in patient identifiers, provincial code sets and governance like Ontario's PHIPA.